A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Criminal facts

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On September 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law at the Ulsan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the port prison on March 27, 2017.

[A] On May 11, 2018, at around 04:55, the Defendant assaulted “C” restaurant located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, with the report of 112, that “A person who takes a walk on the road,” and that “C, a police officer belonging to the Ulsan-gu Police Station D District Unit, etc., who was called out, attempted to sleep to protect the Defendant, “A., I must know,” and assaulted “C’s body at one time as a drinking,” and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported 112 report of the said slope E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. As to the investigation report (as to the attachment of video materials):

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (the confirmation of the expiration of the term of punishment and attachment of the relevant written judgment);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [type of determination] : (a) the basic area [decision on the sphere of recommendation] [the scope of recommendation] six months to one year and six months [the general sentencing person] ] - The act of assaulting a police officer called out due to a person who was reported on the road at the same time as this case is not only the renunciation of his/her safe relief, but also the attack on the safety of the public; (b) the defendant is not liable; (c) the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for interfering with the performance of official duties in 2011; (d) the defendant was sentenced to a fine for interference with the performance of official duties in 2010; (e) interference with the performance of official duties; and (e) interference with the execution of official duties; and (e) the defendant further interferes with the execution of official duties.