logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.04.23 2020고정103
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a social service worker who serves in the Cdong community service center located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. The Defendant: 2019

7. At around 13:00, at the first floor of the above Cdong community service center, the Defendant’s cell phone (opphone 6S) was installed between the Defendant’s slicker and the Defendant’s mobile phone, and the Defendant’s sleeped the Defendant’s mobile phone between the slicker and the slicker, and attempted to photograph the part of the victim’s slick part of the cellular phone with the victim’s slick. However, the Defendant’s slick slick slick slick slick s

2. On August 2019, the Defendant attempted to take a dynamic image of the part of the victim E (the victim’s 26 years of age) using the Defendant’s mobile phone at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) above and in the same manner as the foregoing paragraph (1), but was attempted to take a dynamic image. However, the Defendant had experienced fear of fear of scambling and deleted the scam and deleted it.

3. On August 2019, the Defendant tried to photograph the victim D’s cell phone images with the Defendant’s cell phone using the same method as the foregoing paragraph (1) at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) above, but the Defendant suspended and deleted the scambling of scams and deleted the scams.

4. On September 1, 2019, the Defendant tried to take a dynamic image of the victim F (the 25 years of age) by using the Defendant’s mobile phone at the place indicated in the foregoing Paragraph (1) and using the same method as the foregoing Paragraph (1). However, the Defendant attempted to take a dynamic image of the victim F (the 25 years of age) on the cell phone, but continued to take a dynamic image and deleted her

5. On September 20, 2019, at around 10:45, the Defendant tried to take a dynamic image of the victim F with the Defendant’s cell phone using the same method as the foregoing paragraph (1), however, the Defendant attempted to take a dynamic image of the victim F with the Defendant’s cell phone, but was in an attempted attempt by stopping and deleting the scambling of fears.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to take photographs against the will of the victims who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using mobile phone cameras in total five times.

arrow