beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,925,50 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 10, 2016 to August 22, 2017.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: C Urban Development Project (II) - Public notice: The defendant: D public notice of Gyeonggi-do on April 2, 2010, E publicly notice of the king on April 9, 2013, the Gyeonggi-do public notice of March 28, 2012, and G public notice of Gyeonggi-do on April 10, 2014;
B. The ruling of expropriation made by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on April 25, 2016 - The subject of expropriation: The Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal’s Do governor 398m2, 398m2, 3,715m2, J 300m2, and 20m20m20m2, K-road (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) owned by the Plaintiff: The starting date of expropriation: June 9, 2016 - Compensation: 3,338,500m2: Gyeonggi-do Land Tribunal’s Gyeonggi-do District Tribunal’s branch office, the Pacific Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”).
(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 23, 2017 - Contents of the ruling: The Plaintiff’s objection is dismissed - An appraisal corporation: the sports branch office of the Gyeong Appraisal Corporation and the sports branch office of the Uniform Appraisal and Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Objection Ruling and Appraisal”):
D. As a result of the court’s entrustment to appraiser L - Contents of appraisal: A total of KRW 3,349,429,000 (where the land adjacent to J is deemed to be the “transfer”) or total of KRW 3,476,869,00 (where the adjacent land adjacent to J land is deemed to be the “lease”) [based on recognition]; (a) there is no dispute; (b) Gap’s evidence 1, 2 (including additional number; hereinafter the same shall apply); Eul’s evidence 2, and 3; (c) the appraisal commission for appraiser L; and (d) the purport of the entire pleadings;
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion that the appraisal of expropriation and the appraisal of the objection on each of the lands of this case is unfair without reflecting the market price.
In addition, the J land and K land were used as a road through the king viewing construction, but it was not paid compensation, and it was at the time of beginning to be used as a road.