logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.02.15 2010가합16705
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant is a plaintiff A, B, C, D, plaintiff E, plaintiff F, plaintiff G, plaintiff H, plaintiff J, plaintiff J, plaintiff K, and plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is an executor of the construction project of the Gosi-gu BX apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), which is the company that sold the apartment of this case, and the plaintiffs are the buyers who concluded the sales contract with the defendant for each apartment of this case, or have been transferred each of the above sections by donation or sale from the buyer.

B. The plaintiffs (the plaintiffs as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article; hereinafter "the date of conclusion of the sale contract") to whom the claim on the attached list of damages was partially accepted have entered into a sale contract with the defendant as to each of the corresponding apartment units stated in the "Dong-ho" column of the above table among the apartment units of this case on each of the corresponding dates stated in the above table, and the defendant has completed the registration of transfer of ownership as to each of the corresponding sectional units at each corresponding date stated in the "date of occupancy" column of the above table, and the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs (hereinafter "the plaintiffs of non-sellers") have received the registration of transfer of ownership as to each of the corresponding sections of the above table from the defendant on each corresponding date stated in the "date of occupancy" column.

C. The apartment complex of this case consists of 1301 units (1 to 4), 1302 units (1, 2), 1303 units (1, 2), 1304 units (1 to 4), 1305 units (1, 2), 1306 units (1, 2), 1307 units (1, 1307 units (1 to 4), and 7 units (2 units of the lawsuit of this case) units (2 units of this case were discovered in the area immediately adjacent to the apartment complex of this case) were located at the time of the sale of each apartment unit.

[Based on Recognition] A’s without dispute, Gap’s evidence 1-2, Gap’s evidence 2-7, Gap’s evidence 6-1, Gap’s evidence 141, Gap’s evidence 18-2, 3, Eul’s evidence 1-8, Eul’s evidence 10-1 through 71, Eul’s evidence 15-1 through 32, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims by the buyer.

arrow