logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.11.11 2019누60785
출국금지기간연장처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed in exchange is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The second 19 to 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows.

4. The Defendant: (a) issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure (from July 8, 2019 to January 7, 2020) on July 5, 2019; (b) issued a disposition to extend the period of prohibition of departure on December 31, 2019 (from January 8, 2020 to July 7, 2020); and (c) extended the period of prohibition of departure on July 1, 2020 to January 7, 2021 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

A) During the third 1st sentence of the first instance judgment of "A", "A evidence No. 3" is raised as "A No. 3 and 4."

The following shall be added to the 13th page of the judgment of the first instance.

No. 200 million won (Evidence No. 18, 20, 21, and 23). The Plaintiff had access to the J in 2018, and she had earned income equivalent to approximately KRW 20 million (Evidence No. 18, 20, 21, and 23). There are reasonable grounds to suspect that the Plaintiff has property hidden in Korea. As to this, the Plaintiff took the friendly Gu to J, received the fee, received the said fee, and carried out gambling in the said money several times, and all the income received was paid to her friendly relationship, but it is difficult to believe it as is.”

2. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed to exchange in this court is dismissed as it is without merit.

(2) The judgment of the court of first instance on July 5, 2019, which sought the cancellation of the disposition of this court on July 5, 2019, was withdrawn by the exchange change in this court, and thus

arrow