logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.06.25 2019고단1461
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaged in driving a rocketing taxi.

On January 22, 2019, the Defendant driven the above taxi on January 22, 2019, and became to turn to the left at the seat of the D apartment room from the front of the Dong area, depending on one lane among the four-lanes in the prescribed intersection area in the Geum-gu, Busan.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed in the front bank, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to turn to the yellow signal, and neglected to turn to the left at the opposite lane due to occupational negligence, and caused the left part of the victim B's 124CC, who did not display the number plate of the victim B's driving, to the front part of the Defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from the pressure damage to the left-hand side requiring approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and suffered a permanent pedestrian disability due to the cutting of the 1,2 leged by the left-hand side, and suffered from a fluoral or incurable disease.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a 124CC with no number plate.

The defendant driving the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the date and time specified in paragraph (1) and proceeded from the Gu Seo-dong room to the Dong-dong room in accordance with the two-lanes between the six-lanes of the prescribed intersection road located in the Geum-gu, Busan.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so, and even if he is red signal, he is found to be yellow signal from the opposite lane due to occupational negligence.

arrow