beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,584,544 as well as 5% per annum from July 22, 2014 to December 6, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 21, 2014, B entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant “non-dividend professional life health displayers 1402”.
According to the above insurance contract's liability for damages, the defendant is obliged to compensate for damages sustained by the insured by bearing legal liability for physical disability of another person caused by an insured (other than a house)'s daily life (excluding the ownership, use, and management of real estate other than a house) during the insurance period of the special contract.
(Special Terms and Conditions Nos. 1 and 2) C are children of B as insured workers of the instant insurance contract.
B. On July 22, 2014, the Plaintiff, along with four employees, including C, drink, and the Plaintiff stated the instant accident date in the instant complaint on July 23, 2014. However, on November 2, 2016, the Plaintiff corrected the instant accident date to July 22, 2014.
At 21:00 all together, C has been placed in its own custody.
C recommended the Plaintiff to drink alcohol in the high water site, and was salking the Plaintiff’s shoulder and salking, and the Plaintiff refused the proposal of C, and went beyond C by salveing the bridge.
C, once the Plaintiff’s shoulder was shakened and scisfed, the Plaintiff scisfing the Plaintiff’s shoulder and scisfing the Plaintiff, and again, the Plaintiff tried to scisfing the B’s bridge. As C has lost its center, it goes beyond the Plaintiff and went to the Plaintiff’s right kne, and kne down to the Plaintiff’s right kne.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
The plaintiff suffered from the injury of the Republic of Korea, one of the two sides of the right side of the accident of this case.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 8, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, C has the Plaintiff’s right-free will be strong, going beyond the center.