beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 1, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) accompanied by Defendant B’s accompanying to the mountain run by Defendant C’s “E Mountain Association”; (b) went through the F Tourist bus driven by Defendant C (hereinafter “instant bus”); and (c) completed a schedule of at least 17:30 p.m. and returned to Masan by taking aboard the instant bus and returning to Masan by using the said bus.
The defendant D's federation (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant D') is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for the bus.
B. The Plaintiff was seated in the third corridor front of the driver’s seat of the bus of this case, but Defendant B was seated in the corridor of the bus of this case, and the Plaintiff was faced with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.
C. The Plaintiff asserted that Defendant C, who was on the wind that Defendant C was making a sudden operation of the bus in this case, came to go beyond the Plaintiff’s direction, and that he was thereby suffering at least 50% of the shoulder 50% of the right, and filed a complaint against Defendant C on charges of causing the injury by negligence, due to the charge of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. However, each non-prosecution decision was rendered on charges of causing the injury by negligence.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. At the time of April 1, 2018, members of the mountain conference, including Defendant B, had no drinking in the bus corridor of the instant case, and Defendant C had a "control vehicle" for passengers to avoid the crackdown of the police. Accordingly, the bus of this case was rapidly driven and driven from time to time.
During that period, Defendant C, who was at the hallway, lost the center of Defendant B, who was on the hallway, left the back part of the Plaintiff’s right shoulder with her knee, and her knee, cut off the Plaintiff’s right shoulder and her kne with the Plaintiff’s right kne.
Accordingly, the plaintiff is too serious.