1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant (Appointed Party), Appointed C, D, and E are 11.1 each to the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part concerning which the appeal is to be filed or added under paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Following the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part used or added is just for 4 reasons: “(In contrast to the fact that the Defendant, etc. made considerable efforts to perform the contract by delaying the payment date upon the Plaintiff’s request and installing a bathhouse, etc., the Plaintiff did not pay any balance on the delayed payment date without any particular reason; and thereafter, expressed the intention that the Defendant, etc. will not perform the contract any longer on the grounds that the sale price is not high thereafter, and that the sale price is not high).”

The 5th 10 and 11th 11 of the judgment of the first instance (the defendant did not appear) shall be deleted.

All parts of the 5th 12th 12th 's 12th '4th 's 's '4th 's 's 's '

4) As to this, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant, etc. is liable to compensate the Defendant, etc. for the damages equivalent to KRW 16207,095,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, which is less than KRW 370,000,000,000,000, which is less than KRW 10,000,000,000,000, which is less than KRW 3770,000,000,000,000,000 won, due to the Plaintiff’s nonperformance of obligation, and the Defendant, etc. is offset against the down payment and intermediate payment to be returned to the Plaintiff by the Defendant, etc.

B. According to the evidence No. 7, the defendant et al. paid KRW 3 million at the plaintiff's request. Thus, the defendant et al. is acknowledged.