1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff received each donation of the instant land No. 1 from the Cho Dong-dong on March 10, 197 from the Cho Dong-dong on September 25, 1982, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land No. 1 and 2 on November 1, 1993.

B. On the land of this case, the portion of “B” in the ship connecting each of the items in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 in the order of priority among the items in the separate sheet No. 1, and the parts in the separate sheet No. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 5 in the separate sheet No. 20, 23, 24, 28, 27, 26, 24, 14, 19, and 20 in the order of priority among the items in the separate sheet No. 1, the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 10 through 14, 26, 24, 204, 23, 203, 21, 202, and 35,000 square meters in the separate sheet No. 1, 200.

C. Since around around 1969, G, the Defendant’s wife, owned the instant house, etc., and around 1985, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with G on the land Nos. 1 and 2, the land of this case, which is the site for the instant house, with G, with no agreement between G and G for a period of 80 km to rent for the value of the rice shotma. D.

G died in around 2001, and the defendant, his father, succeeded to the instant house, etc. from that time to that time, and lived in the instant house, etc., and the plaintiff and the defendant around that time.

The lease contract (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease contract”) was concluded as stipulated in Paragraph (1).

E. The Defendant resided in the instant house, etc. from around 2009 to around 201, when the Defendant, a partner of the non-friendly household, resided in the instant house, etc. for the purpose of hospitalized treatment. In other words, the Defendant resided in the instant house, etc. from September 201 to September 201.

F. On April 10, 2013, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement to the Defendant.