A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2017, at around 01:42, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the front of the entrance of the 93-lane 4 (Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road), and the Defendant committed a h (47 years of age) Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Do road Guar-gu, Changwon-gu, who was called upon 112 after receiving a report, Do Do Do Do d (47 years of age) Do Do Do dong Do Do Do dong Do,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by shots);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Based on the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below), the sentencing conditions as set forth in the instant case, such as the age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be set as follows: (a) the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court’s sentencing guidelines (6 months in the basic area of interfering with the performance of official duties (6 months in the basic area of interference with the performance of official duties - one year and six months); and (b) the sentence shall be set as set forth in the order.

A favorable circumstances: The defendant has no particular criminal record, confessions, and repents his mistake, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case in a contingency by drinking, and the degree of damage caused thereby is not severe: The fact that there is a need for strict punishment for the crime of interference with the execution of official duties in order to establish the state's legal order and eradicate the light of public authority.