Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. on August 25, 2018, and two years of suspension of execution was finally decided on November 2, 2018.

1. On August 1, 2018, in collusion, Defendant 2 and Defendant 2 concluded that “The victim D, who reported and contacted advertising writing that “a six-year guarantee company would grant a loan”, “I would not give a loan because of the details of the loan to another company,” and that “I would give a loan amounting to KRW 3 million to the bank on the face of the State, by opening a new mobile phone with no details of the mobile phone calls or the details of the small-amount settlement.”

In fact, the defendant and B thought that they would dispose of the mobile phone received from the victim to distribute it as a mobile phone, and disposed of about KRW 700,000 per unit to take profits equivalent to the cost of the mobile phone, and there was no intention or ability to receive the loan from the victim.

Defendant

B, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, it received from the victim one cell phone of the 957,000 won of the market value which was newly opened in the name of the victim in the direction of the victim on the same day from the Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and then received from the victim one mobile phone of the 1,367,000 won of the market value and the 1,367,000 won of

2. The Defendants in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act will offer to D a new loan of KRW 3 million with two cellphones on the face of a new opening, as described in paragraph (1), at the time and place described in paragraph (1).

The phrase "D," made D enter into a contract for opening the mobile phone (G) in the name of F and D, a telecommunications business operator, and continued to enter into a contract for opening the mobile phone (I) in the name of H and D, a telecommunications business operator on the same day.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer funds, thereby soliciting contracts on the provision of telecommunications services necessary for the use of mobile communications devices.