Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for embezzlement and two years of suspended execution at the Seoul Eastern District Court. The above judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the subway station near the subway station in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, transferred the claim to the victim B to the effect that “The Defendant, who would have borrowed 200 million won to D but has not been paid, would have transferred the claim to the party, and would have changed the down payment to KRW 3 million for the collection of the claim.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any way to recover the above KRW 200 million, and if the receipt was not drawn up even after receiving money from the victim, he did not think of it with money, and did not have any intention or ability to recover the claim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, had the victim deceptioned and received KRW 3 million from the victim, namely, from the victim who was in his seat, as a result of the recovery of claims, and received a total of KRW 8 million from the beginning of March 2014 to the early of March 2014, including the content of the attached crime list (1).

2. Around November 10, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, a mother described in paragraph (1) B, from the subway C Station No. 4 adjacent to the exit area in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would have lent KRW 200 million to the victim E, who is the mother described in paragraph (1), to recover the money that he/she had not been paid even if he/she lent to D, but would have changed to KRW 1.2 million as the progress cost for the recovery of the claim.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any way to recover the above KRW 200 million, and if the receipt was not drawn up even after receiving money from the victim, he did not think of it with money, and he did not have any intention or ability to recover the claim against the above B.

Accordingly, the Defendant is the victim as above.