logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.31 2017나2009891
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance is just in finding facts and determining the first instance court’s determination even if the video of evidence No. 42 submitted by the plaintiffs at the court of first instance were to be seen as the video of evidence No. 42, and there are no errors as alleged by the plaintiffs in the grounds of appeal). 2. The part of the first instance court’s decision No. 3, “ship No. 9” as “ship No. 1. n.

A. On the 5th judgment of the first instance court, the plaintiffs set forth in the 4th judgment below to “Is the Plaintiffs.”

A. On the 7th judgment of the first instance court, “the instant building” was cited as “the instant building.”

A. According to the 5th sentence of the first instance judgment, “Plaintiff M” in the 8th sentence shall be deemed “Plaintiff B”.

P. Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the instant road works” in Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be “the construction cost of the instant road works”, and the “the construction cost” in Part 9 of the same Act shall be “the construction cost of the instant road works

3. The decision of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow