A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1653"

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On August 29, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at a convenience store in C on August 29, 2017, on the ground that the mobile phone c convenience store in C, which was charged with being drunk at around 12:00 on August 29, 2017, was drunk, and the mobile phone c, at around 47 years of age, contracted to the victim E (e.g., employee of the place) who was an employee of the said store, “nicking off the fright, making the fright of the fright, making the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

B. On August 29, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at F convenience stores on August 29, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of the F convenience store located in G around 14:00 on August 29, 2017, and was not under the influence of alcohol, H (n, 48 years old) of the victim H (n, an employee) who was the employee of the Defendant, was not under the influence of alcohol;

In this governance, 200 20

Head of the Gu, 200

The head of Si/Gun/Gu, Spool, the President of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, and the head of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, the head of Si/Gun/Gu, as well as the non-official belonging to the private security enterprise who was dispatched after receiving the victim's report;

Polices have been suffering from disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as being boomed with a large volume of "police ple or Mara", and being pushed with hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

(c)

On August 29, 2017, the Defendant, at the I cafeteria on August 29, 2017, expressed that “The Defendant, at around 15:00 on August 29, 2017, was under the influence of alcohol at the I cafeteria work as an employee, and without any reason, she was under the influence of alcohol at the I cafeteria’s work as an employee.” The Defendant, at the I cafeteria, she was under the influence of the Defendant’s body.