A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant C to the applicant C in the amount of KRW 2.3 million and the applicant D for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was revised.

1. The Defendant, “2018 Highest 490,” who did not have any occupation or income, led to a shortage of living expenses, etc., leading up to the sale of used products against many and unspecified persons via the Internet, with the intention to acquire money under the name of the purchase price.

On August 7, 2017, the Defendant sells 32GB to the Internet NAVV and the Internet NAB by using smartphones at the Defendant’s house located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, 1104 dong 403 dong-gu.

After inserting the writing “,” the victim F who reported and contacted the above writing on the same day, the victim F, who made the contact, would normally sell the above goods.

However, even if the defendant receives the price of goods from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell it normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received money of KRW 2.60,00 from the above victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received money of KRW 5,59,000 from the time to September 26, 2017 and acquired money of KRW 5,59,000 in total through six times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

2. "2018 Highest 966".

A. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim H was connected to the Defendant’s residence located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu E apartment complex 1104 Dong-gu, Yongsan-gu, 403, the Defendant’s mobile phone to the Defendant’s NAV “China-gu” car page using the Defendant’s mobile phone, and sold agricultural machinery (management equipment) on the bulletin board.

“The transfer of KRW 80,00 to the victim H who reported and contacted the transfer of the said KRW 80,00,000.”

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not own agricultural machinery at the time and did not have the intention or ability to send agricultural machinery even if he receives the price for the goods from the injured party.

The defendant belongs to this.