logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.12.30 2013고정103
사기미수
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The female president of the PO apartment in Busan Shipping Daegu, and the defendant A is the representative of each Dong of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment, defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L and P are the representative of the above apartment, the persons who were officers of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment, the defendant M is the resident of the above apartment, and Q are the office of the R office.

The victim S is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment from July 2007 to May 2009.

I are only those who have been employed.

On June 2009, the Defendants affirmed the winning in the claim for damages arising from defamation against the Defendants. On the other hand, the Defendants attempted to claim for the costs of lawsuit against the victim at a retaliation against the mosive act, such as filing a lawsuit against them, and asked Q, who was the chief secretary of the R office, who was in charge of the various cases of the pre-O apartment, to request Q to file a false claim for the costs of lawsuit with the court by using Q, which was issued a false receipt.

1. “2013 high-level 103”: Defendant B, the said Defendants, and Q, at the R Office located in Busan City’s annual building No. 1105 around August 30, 201, and Defendant A and Defendant B, despite the fact that Defendant A and Defendant B paid KRW 100,000 to the said Attorney-at-Law’s office on September 1, 2009 as reference materials, they received false receipts equivalent to KRW 900,000 in total as shown in the attached list of crimes, such as obtaining receipts of such false contents from Defendant Q, etc.; on the same day, the Busan District Court, as well as the Dong Branch of the Busan District Court, attempted to mislead the victim of the litigation costs by submitting an application for a final decision on the amount of litigation costs plus the above false receipts and the actual receipts.

However, on October 24, 201, U of the judicial assistant belonging to the Busan District Court's Dong Branch is excluded from the amount corresponding to the above false receipt.

arrow