logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.29 2014나43189
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) ordering payment from the following point of view.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the plaintiff's representative council's principal lawsuit and defendant Q Q's counterclaim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives transferred the instant nursery facilities without any title, and the defendant Q Q occupied the instant nursery facilities without any title. The defendants jointly and severally, the plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives, ① from December 1, 201 to March 5, 201, ② the sum of the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent (i.e., 70,000 x 15 months x 15 months), ② the pertinent litigation cost 4,515,279, ③ the compulsory execution cost of the pertinent lawsuit, ④ The plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives was the duty to pay the plaintiff's lease deposit from the plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives to the plaintiff's 10,710 (payment by the plaintiff), and Q Q Q Q 2,379,370, and the plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives was not the plaintiff's lease deposit to the plaintiff's 2,2013.

arrow