A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the father and mother of the victim B (eight months after the birth).

No person shall abandon a child under his/her protection and supervision.

On December 15, 2015, at around 23:30 on December 15, 2015, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant, brought a dispute with D, the husband of Pyeongtaek-si Cudio D 202, and her husband, left the house, left the house, opened the door, and opened the door. However, the Defendant left the victim at the front of the entrance without any answer within the house.

Accordingly, the defendant abandons the victim who is a child under his protection and supervision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, 112 reported statements;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Article 71 (1) 2 and subparagraph 6 of Article 17 of the Act on the Place of Child’s Reinstatement of Punishment for the Crime (or Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following conditions of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.

- The nature of the crime of this case does not correspond to that of the victim, provided, however, that the victimized child was not in the position of a larger injury due to the crime of this case. - there is no past record of criminal punishment for the defendant. - The defendant is against his mistake.