1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Defendant.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant Dae-gu Corporation

A. In full view of Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 5, Eul evidence Nos. 5-1 and 5-2, as a result of the appraisal commission to the tin Industry Safety Technology Institute Office Co., Ltd., the fact-finding results, and the overall purport of the pleadings, the plaintiff owned the Daegu Jung-gu Housing (hereinafter "the instant housing"), the defendant Daeung-gu Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter "the defendant Tae-gu Construction Co., Ltd.") contracted from the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter "the defendant Jung-gu"), and around September 2014, after being awarded a contract with the defendant Tae-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter "the defendant Jung-gu"), performed the construction work of removing the existing ice package and packing it with sulfur concrete volumeing 5 to 10cm (hereinafter "the construction work of this case"), and the fact that the construction work of this case and the construction work of this case had contact with the building of this case and the construction work of this case without any distance.

B. In full view of the result of the appraisal commission and the purport of the entire pleadings to the office of Yansan Structure Safety Technology Co., Ltd. for damages recognized as the scope of compensation for damages, the fact that the construction cost incurred from the instant construction project requires KRW 6,252,00 as the construction cost to repair the inner walls and floors of the instant housing, fluoring, fluoring, and fluoring, etc., and it is reasonable to deem the said construction cost as the damages incurred from the instant construction project (the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 9,482,00,000 as the remuneration construction cost, but exceeds the above recognition scope.