beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiffs, each of the amounts stated in the “personal fee” column in the attached Table 2 sheet, and each of the above amounts.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs are the parties. 1) The plaintiffs are the 9-story collective housing of reinforced concrete structure with the land of Seo-gu Busan and its ground reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter "the building of this case").
(2) Defendant A is the owner of the instant construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) of the construction of the main complex building with the height of 12 and 13 each of the 12 stories on the Seo-gu, Busan, and D (hereinafter “instant new building”) adjacent to the instant building, and the construction of the Defendant Gold Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Gold Integrated Construction”) is the construction of the instant construction.
B. The instant construction was commenced from March 4, 2014, and among which, during which the instant construction was commenced from March 5, 2014, from March 5, 2014 to May 21, 2014, Defendant Gold Integrated Construction was conducted, and the depth of the ground excavated is about 11m. 2) The Plaintiff filed a civil petition demanding safety management due to the instant construction and prevention of noise damage to the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government Office on March 5, 2014. On December 2, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition with the said Seo-gu Office demanding the suspension of construction and compensation for damages.
C. The present condition of the instant building is about nine floors above the ground, and the structure of reinforced concrete was completed on December 29, 200, and the interval between the instant building and the instant new building is about one meter.
As of the defects existing in the building of this case, there are defects such as 13 cm to or 18 cm to the new building of this case, and cresh between the building and the ground, and cresh and mashing, destruction, and creshing of other buildings, and some parts of the building of this case, such as the handling of the floor, sturth of the wall, and creshing.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant defect”). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 7, and Eul evidence 1 to 1.