A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2014, at the D office located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on the ground that employees transport gas and slife gas at each level, the Defendant held gasoline 5 L and a disposable straw with the aim to prevent the above office, and found gasoline as the office, and told the victim E, who had worked in the office with the gasoline 5-L and a disposable straw with the aim to prevent the above office, to die at the entrance of the office.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared the fire prevention of existing buildings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Police seizure records, investigation reports, investigation reports (in respect of seized articles), investigation reports (in relation to confirmation of ingredients of oil), investigation reports (in relation to confirmation of ingredients of oil), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on criminal investigation (in response

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects his mistake, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, the defendant continuously generated noise and vibration, and the defendant filed a civil petition but failed to properly resolve it. The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol due to pharmacologic by means of normal depression, etc. In addition, the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of various kinds of sentencing factors as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's health status, age, character and behavior, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.