A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2, 2015, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) and a de facto marriage-related person C, which were operated by the Defendant and a de facto marriage-related person C, attempted to leave the restaurant in C, by breaking up the idea that C was negligent from opening the restaurant, and neglecting the Defendant; (b) to put C’s restaurant in mind; and (c) to find a theater and store C’s restaurant with a volume of 2 liter for 2 liters, which were kept in the house; and (d) to leave C’s restaurant on the front floor of the entrance; (c) to remove it on his own; and (d) to prevent it from the building in which people are present.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to seizure records and investigation reports (field confirmation, etc.);

1. The main sentence of Article 175 and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;