logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.07 2018고단1353
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of 1-A and 2-C and 2-2 of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on May 11, 2016 at the early branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and two years of suspension of execution, protection observation, and community service order on the 19th of the same month, which became final and conclusive on March 15, 2018. On May 3, 2018, the sentence of suspension of execution was revoked due to a violation of the code of practice, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 2018 upon being sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on May 3, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. A. On December 30, 2015, the Defendant drafted a loan transaction agreement in order to obtain a loan from the EN Love Loan Co., Ltd. on or around the following points: (a) without permission, written “D” and “E” in the customer name column; and (b) sent the forged loan transaction agreement to the EN Love Loan Co., Ltd., Ltd., without knowledge of the fact, by facsimile as if the contract was duly concluded.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a “loan Transaction Agreement” in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2) On January 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) drafted a credit transaction agreement to obtain a loan from the OK Savings Bank in order to obtain a loan from the OK Savings Bank; (b) made, without permission, written “D” and “E” in the customer name column and the resident registration number column; and (c) sent the forged credit transaction agreement by facsimile as if the said agreement was duly concluded to the employee of the OK Savings Bank without knowledge of the circumstances.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged “a letter of credit transaction” in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

B. Fraud 1) Defendant 1 is the date and time set forth in the above A-A-1, and at the same place, the said forged loan transaction agreement was duly concluded.

arrow