logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.28 2019고정523
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant filed a divorce and a claim for damages against C and the victim D who had a relationship with C, and received a judgment of partial winning the plaintiff on September 4, 2019 from the Gwangju Family Court's net support of the Gwangju Family Court to recognize a fraudulent act by C. The appellate court also rendered a judgment of the same purport as August 18, 2020, and currently is pending in the final appeal.

"2019 Highly 523"

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection;

A. A. On August 20, 2019, the Defendant posted a letter on the victim’s face with the intent to obstruct the victim by accessing the Defendant’s cell phone by using F fishing cprinking with the Defendant’s cell phone. Around that time, the Defendant posted a letter on Fpropon, stating, “Apicker who reported to the police station his/her her son’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s son’s her son’

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts through the information and communication network with the aim of slandering the person.

B. On September 5, 2019, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence in Ma, up to September 5, 2019, posted a statement on the victim’s face pictures with a view to harming the victim by accessing the F Frop system with the Defendant’s cell phone, and made it possible for many unspecified people who view F to pay consolation money to the Defendant and C to know that the Defendant had an internal relationship with the victim, with the intent to defame the victim. By doing so, the 27 Doo-D would have to be aware of the divorce by the time of death. Of course, 44 Doo-C would have to pay consolation money.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering people, the defendant is a victim by openly pointing out facts through information and communications networks.

arrow