logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.03 2017구합75323
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(c) shall be.

(2) On July 5, 2016, the Defendant requested the management entity specialized in improvement projects registered in Seoul Special Metropolitan City to submit data on the following capital and technical personnel in order to verify whether the management entity specialized in improvement projects complies with the registration standards for the management entity specialized in improvement projects, and the Plaintiff did not submit such data. The details of the inspection of capital at least KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,00.

C. On June 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) due to the Plaintiff’s failure to meet the registration standards for the Plaintiff; (b) failure to submit materials; and (c) failure to meet the registration standards for full-time manpower of B Certified Judicial Scriveners (registration January 20, 201); and (c) failure to meet the registration standards for full-time manpower of B Certified Judicial Scriveners (registration January 20, 201); (b) Article 73(1)2 of the former Urban Improvement Act; (c) Article 66 [Attachment 5] of the former Enforcement Decree of the Urban Improvement Act (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No.

2. The one-year business suspension disposition was rendered from June 9, 2017 to June 8, 2018 on the ground that the violation of items (b) and (e) (i) of individual standards was committed (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(ii) [Facts having no dispute over the basis of recognition.]

arrow