logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.11 2018나2017356
공제급여
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or dismissal of a part as follows. Thus, this case is quoted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the first instance judgment, first instance judgment’s 5th page “no cause of death of the deceased is revealed,” the “this accident is not an accident caused by educational activities, and thus does not constitute a school safety accident.”

The last 8th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "A No. 3" and "A. 3."

The 10th written judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the 15th judgment") in which "the cause can be known" shall be changed to "the cause cannot be known."

Subsequent to the 192,891,53 won [1,972,63 won (363,945,266 won related to lost income of the deceased x 10,981,90 won for funeral 1/2)] of the first instance judgment in the first instance of the 4 to the 5th sentence [192,89,54,533 won for survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses of 181,972,63 won and funeral expenses of 10,981,90 won in the calculation of 192,954,533 won in the first instance judgment, and as long as only the defendant appealed, the amount cited by the first instance judgment shall be maintained)].

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

arrow