beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 2012, the Defendant, at the first place of a coffee shop in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 2012, committed as if he had a son B, who came to know of the following: “I would be able to pay money if I would purchase the C Company shares, would be able to make a contribution to the shares if I would lend money, and would be 10% interest per month. I would be able to pay 10% interest every month. I would like to see a lot of money with the shares, and would be able to have the victim attend a securities company in the victim’s name. I would like to see that I would like to believe that I would go to the victim that I would attend the securities company for a long period of time, and that I would be able to believe that I would actually have a son who was going to attend the company in the name of a woman and that it was in the name of a third party.”
However, Defendant D did not go to a securities company, and it was not a self-owned property that can be individually disposed of, such as commercial buildings in the name of female and female, even if she borrowed money from a victim, it was thought that it was used as a repayment of personal and living cost, and even if it was invested in stocks, there was no ability to pay 10% interest every month.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving him/her from the victim to the post office passbook in his/her name on September 11, 2012, KRW 20 million on September 14, 2012, KRW 20 million on September 24, 2012, and KRW 45 million on September 24, 2012, acquired by defrauding him/her.
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of the protocol of examination of the accused by the prosecution (including B's statement);
1. Statement to E by the police;
1. Prosecution investigation reports;
1. To apply a loan certificate, personal financial transaction certificate, family relation certificate, each real estate register, and detailed statement of transactions to statutes;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment;