logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 04. 28. 선고 2016두32114 판결
(심리불속행) 토지거래허가구역 내 토지를 취득하고 미등기 후 합의해제하여도 양도에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court-2015-Nu-5831 ( October 07, 2016)

Title

(A) The transfer of land within the land transaction permission zone shall constitute a transfer even after the acquisition of land in the land transaction permission zone and the cancellation of agreement after registration.

Summary

(main point of original instance) If the land within the land transaction permission zone is acquired, and the land was expropriated without completing the registration of ownership transfer, and the land was claimed to have been cancelled before expropriation, but the fact of cancellation of agreement is not proved in detail, it shall be deemed

Related statutes

Article 88 of the Income Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow