The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the Defendant’s innocence, even though it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on D, such as a fatfa, which requires medical treatment for about 28 days, by making fating D’s face and body fat, and making D’s face and body fat, etc.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., witness D, at this court, stated in this court that "the defendant was faced with 2-3 faces face from the defendant, and her chest was unsatisfed." The photograph taken on the day of the instant case does not include face of D, etc. It was examined by the police on the same day, and it was not easy for the defendant to take care of her head, head, and chest at the time when 3-4 days have passed since the instant case, and the defendant was issued a medical examination at the hospital to the effect that it was difficult for him to take care of her face at the time when she was loaded in the police station, but it was hard for the defendant to take care of her face at the time when she was loaded in the police station, but it was hard for him to take care of her face from her body and her face to the prosecution, and as above, she was found to have no credibility and credibility of her face."