A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2015, at around 06:35, the Defendant used the Defendant’s mobile phone and used the Defendant’s cell phone to take contact with the Defendant’s family members, and used C at the underground parking lot for 376 septic Fran building, “A drinking person is unable to work in front of the vehicle,” the Defendant reported 112 and called “Is the Defendant who was in front of the vehicle,” and the head and chest of C at a time under the circumstances where C was able to make a request for returning back to the vehicle. After that, C took place at a defective place in order for C to take contact with the Defendant’s family members by using the Defendant’s mobile phone, the Defendant assaulted C, by hand, C to b’s dump the bomb, and to dump the bom, and to erop it over.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protective measures of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim and on-site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 20