A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2013, at around 18:35, the Defendant: (a) reported that a drunk person was at risk of coming to the road, and was asked by the slope C of the police station box affiliated with the police station box and the Inspector D about the Defendant’s personal information on the roads, the Defendant tried to see that “A Marano, 119 was reported by the police officer,” and that “A Doono, Doooo, Doo, Dooh was the police officer,” and that the Defendant tried to go beyond the road.

Accordingly, as the above D removed the defendant, he was able to gather a sign of plastic parking prohibition that was set up in front of the above agricultural parking lot, and the 쇠s in the above agricultural parking lot were put to the above D.

In order for D and C to continuously restrain the defendant's behavior, the defendant was placed on the ground, and the defendant was fluored once on the shoulder of the above C, and twice twice on the part of the above D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement protocol to E, D, and C;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;