logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.03 2016나55646
상가임차권매매대금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff shall be paid KRW 60,00,000 for the right of lease Nos. 1 and 2 in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, on May 27, 2015; KRW 10,000 for the intermediate payment; KRW 20,000 for the intermediate payment; KRW 30,000 for the remainder payment; KRW 30,000 for the intermediate payment; KRW 30,000 for the intermediate payment and remainder payment; KRW 50 for the intermediate payment and remainder payment, KRW 105,00 for the plaintiff; KRW 105,00 for the interest payment; KRW 30,00 for the remainder payment and remainder payment; KRW 50,000 for the remainder payment; and KRW 105,000 for the plaintiff’s intermediate payment and remainder payment, etc. 205,705,25,27.

2. As to the Defendants’ assertion, the Defendants heard that the Plaintiff would be well aware of funeral and entered into the instant contract; however, the instant commercial building was located in a place where funeral is not well-grounded, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion to the purport that the interest of KRW 20,000,000 and KRW 3% per month should be reduced out of the purchase price, the joint guarantor’s liability should be exempted, and the Defendants’ assertion to the effect that the contract of this case was revoked by deception or deception should be revoked. However, the evidence alone submitted by the Defendants alone is insufficient to acknowledge the said assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it

3...

arrow