A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2014, while the Defendant was running a ecoos car owned by the non-party-owned Co., Ltd. with local tax in arrears, the Defendant kept the front number plate from the Dong-gu office in the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City around October 7, 2014, and was willing to attach a number plate attached to another person's car to the above car and operate it.

1. On October 2014, the Defendant: (a) removed the front number plate of the Victim B owned by the Victim B, which was parked at the victim’s parking lot in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-gu, 903 Smart House; and (b) stolen it.

2. The Defendant at the time, time, and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) of this Article, and used the number plate of the stolen DNA car for the purpose of uttering by attaching it to the Defendant’s front coos car, thereby denying the air coos car registration number plate. On November 6, 2014, around 20:40, the Defendant exercised the automobile registration number plate which was an air coos, which was used unlawfully by operating the said registration number plate under the condition that the said registration number plate was attached as if it were the registration number plate of the Ecoos car in front of the Ecoos car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the arrest of a case;

1. Seizure records;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of comprehensive details of vehicles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 329 (Larceny), 238 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty, and imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Examination of factors, such as the fact that there is no particular criminal history about the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the minor extent of damage in the case of larceny, the fact that it is against the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment;