logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2021.01.15 2020고단850
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 18, 2020, at around 00:00, the Defendant damaged the property of the victim’s property by walking the front gate of the EM5 vehicle owned by the victim D, which was parked in the above parking lot without any justifiable reason, in the front parking lot of the EM5 vehicle, in a state of under the influence of alcohol. The Defendant damaged the property of the victim so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 7.50,000,000, such as the exchange of the front gate.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was assaulted against a female under the influence of alcohol on April 18, 2020 at the place specified in paragraph 1, around 00:06, and at the place specified in paragraph 1.

“A police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report 112, to listen to the circumstances of the instant case, G (the remaining, 45 years old) who is a police officer belonging to the police station of the Gyeongnam Police Station, and at the time there was an assault with the Defendant.

H Ha et al. al. “Ney Hay Hayn Hayn Hayn?

B. The phrase “scambling expenses”, and later, the police officer “if any, at the time of this industrial accident.”

“At the time of the police officer’s head at his hand at the time.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Written statement, written estimate, written diagnosis of each injury, vehicle damaged photographs, visual CCTV caps, badi-copic images of the data to be taken;

1. Application of each investigation report (based on the situation, etc. at the time of dispatch to the scene and telephone communications by witnessesJ);

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 136 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The prosecutor’s opinion on the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of six months: A fine of six million won was imposed, and a police officer was assaulted for a police officer who followed his/her official duty after drinking a fine of six million won.

However, the defendant is recognized as committing a crime and is against the law.

statement is made.

has been punished.

arrow