logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.30 2018가단5083112
공제금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,50,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 27, 2018 to January 30, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 12, 2013, the Plaintiff, a licensed real estate agent, as a broker, leased G units, which are multi-family houses on the fourth floor located in E and F (hereinafter “instant building”) from D, by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 55,00,000, and the lease term of KRW 6, 2015 from July 6, 2013 to July 6, 2015.

(hereinafter “Lease.” The Plaintiff completed the move-in report on July 3, 2013 and received the fixed date, and paid all the lease deposit.

B. C, while mediating the instant lease, stated “rights relationship” as “the description of the description of confirmation of the object of brokerage” (hereinafter “the description of confirmation”), the mortgage amount of KRW 494,00,000, which is indicated in the registry of the instant building. However, no specific explanation or data were provided regarding other leases existing in the instant building, and did not state any description in the “matters of rights of objects which are not de facto relation of rights or public announcement” column of the said description. However, the instant building had been occupied first than the Plaintiff, and the sum of the deposit amount was KRW 560,00,000,000, which was confirmed as indicated “the content of the leased object of which is still in progress,” and it was renewed around July 4, 2015 by KRW 0,000, the aggregate of the deposit amount of KRW 300,000,000,000,000 for each of the instant buildings, including the lease deposit of KRW 40,000,000,00.

The appraised value as of November 16, 2016 on the instant building and its site is 753,385.

arrow