logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.26 2018가단5056707
공제금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 28, 2018 to December 26, 2018; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 17, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) as a broker of the Intervenor’s Intervenor, a licensed real estate agent (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) (hereinafter “instant building”); (b) leased F Building, a multi-family house of the fourth floor located in E, E, from D, KRW 60,00,000; and (c) from January 18, 2014 to January 17, 2016, the lease term of the instant building was determined and leased.

(hereinafter “Lease of this case”). The Plaintiff completed a move-in report on January 20, 2014 and received a fixed date after paying the lease deposit in full.

B. In mediating the lease of this case, the intervenor entered “rights relations” column of “the description of the object of brokerage” (hereinafter “the description of confirmation”) as “the maximum debt amount of KRW 325,000,000 and KRW 155,000,00, which are indicated in the registry of the building of this case. However, the intervenor stated “the matters concerning the rights of the object which are not yet known or publically known” column of the above confirmation statement as “the total deposit of KRW 62,00,000” in “the registered lease of this case was entered as of January 1, 2016”. However, the building of this case was a number of lessees first located in the building of this case, and the aggregate amount of the deposit was also 290,000,000,000,000,0000,000 as indicated “the content of the lease which is still moving in.” The lease of this case was renewed around January 20, 2016.

According to the above auction records, as of May 22, 2017, the sum of the lease deposit amount of KRW 640,000,000, including the Plaintiff’s lease on the instant building as of May 2, 201 (2, 3rd generation and 4th generation, 12th generation, 12th generation), including the Plaintiff’s lease, and the maximum debt amount of KRW 480,00.

arrow