Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

From July 2012, the Defendant, at the Hgallon of the G operation of Sinpo City F, the victim I was not born, and the victim I and the victim J did not engage in any act that could not be called the “balton” under the nominal name. However, the Defendant knew of his knowledge, and talked with K and G, “E was introduced to I, and it was forced to do so so, as he did so, and he did so. I knew of the fact that he got divorced and grow up to her, and said, I would like to do so with E. I.J. The I and J expressed that “I will do so. I are balll sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness I/J/K/G;

1. Each police statement of K/G (the defendant asserts that the statement of the police officer's statement "the defendant is not that of his own, but that he heard the defendant's story and G. However, the defendant sought G in order to listen to the misunderstanding that he "K and G did not have a face at the time of being in school" and that he did not have such talk to K and G, and he heard that he did not have such talk to I, it is judged that the defendant maintained credibility and credibility between I and E in the process of claiming that I did not have made such a speech, and that I did not have a relation between I and E, I and I have a son and a son, and that there was a son who recorded a telephone conversation with L to support this, ② the defendant maintained the relationship between I and the defendant's testimony and the defendant's testimony in light of the following facts: the defendant's testimony and testimony at the time, and the defendant's testimony and testimony at the time were not sufficient.

On the other hand, however,