1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,396,836 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from November 21, 2015 to June 23, 2017.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence 1, 2, and 5 as to the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff processed and supplied a fiber amounting to KRW 40,074,430 from August 2014 to August 2015, and the defendant paid KRW 2,00,000,000 to the plaintiff on November 3, 2014, and KRW 2,000,000,000 on March 17, 2015, respectively, shall be paid to the plaintiff on March 25, 2015, since the fact that the plaintiff is the plaintiff, the defendant shall pay the price for textile processing to the plaintiff KRW 33,074,430, and delay damages.

Although the defendant asserts that the above textile processing costs of KRW 40,074,430 have been arbitrarily increased by the plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize the above argument only with the evidence No. 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

2. As to the defendant's argument

A. The summary of the argument 1) The Defendant paid textile processing costs to the Plaintiff by means of remitting as indicated below (the fact that the Defendant remitted money as indicated below may be recognized by means of evidence No. 5.

5. C. 0. 1. 20: 00: 00 C. 1. 25 on July 25, 2014; 20. 5 on September 24, 2014; 200 A. 3. 40,00 on October 27, 2014; 5. 60,00 on May 60, 2014; 15. 20. 4. 6. 20,00 on May 20, 2015; 20. 5. 20,00 E. 7. 20, 200 on November 14, 2014; 15. 20. 5. 20,00 E. 20,000 on May 4, 2014;