A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 11 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 21, 2017.

[Criminal facts] around 06:30 on February 12, 2017, Defendant 2017 high group 337 Defendant E is urgently required to receive goods from the victim E, who is an employee of the “D” convenience store located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul.

It is also good to affix a photograph to show the resident registration certificate.

A false statement was made stating that it would be necessary to transfer money by transferring the reservation to the account number, and to lend money.

However, at the time, the Defendant did not receive Kwikset goods, and the Defendant obtained money from F to receive KRW 18 million from F and did not repay the said money despite being tried to commit fraud. Rather, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, such as meeting the personal debt of KRW 20 million.

The Defendant received 400,000 won in cash from the injured party on February 15, 2017, as shown in the daily list of crimes, from the injured party, on a total of 1.24,00 won.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2017 Highest 408

1. On February 7, 2017, at H convenience stores located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 7, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the victim I, who is an employee of the H convenience store in Dongdaemun-gu, did not have any money to get a cab with a wall and a key attached thereto. In this context, the Defendant lent KRW 290,000 to the si, used it as a car fee and a key repair cost, and repaid the borrowed money during the o’clock.”

However, even though the defendant was under a judgment of fraud, he was unable to repay most of the damage amount, and there was no property or income to be paid, while the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the victim with the personal debt of KRW 20,000.

Defendant 2.