1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the driver of the freight vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”) owned by the Plaintiff as E, a truck owned by the limited partnership company D (hereinafter referred to as “D”). Defendant C is the driver of the F new frequency truck (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”), and Defendant B is the owner of the Defendant vehicle.

B. On April 10, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle on April 10, 2018; (b) and (c) 43 national highways on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle driving at a speed of 60km in speed from the front side to three lanes at a speed of 60km each hour; and (d) saw the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle back to the front side of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the depth of the lower right bridge due to the instant accident, and Defendant C suffered bodily injury, such as cryp fryp fry, and G, which was on the Defendant’s vehicle as the wife of Defendant C, was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle, suffered bodily injury, such as a cryp fryus

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, 7 through 9, 11, Eul evidence 2 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The place where the instant accident occurred is a motorway operated under high speed by the vehicles passing along. The Defendant C, in order to stop at night, had installed a sign of safety triangulations, red signal signalling, electric system, or flame signalling, as prescribed by the Road Traffic Act and the Enforcement Rule of the same Act. However, the Defendant C and the Defendant C, who is the driver of the Defendant vehicle, jointly with the driver of the instant accident, parked the Defendant vehicle without giving out emergency lights on the three-lanes of the instant accident. As such, the instant accident occurred due to the above negligence of the Defendant C, the Defendant C and the Defendant Company, who is the owner of the Defendant vehicle, should jointly stop the instant accident. As such, the Defendant Company, who is the driver of the instant vehicle, was equipped with KRW 2,763,020, KRW 1,612,72, KRW 6,648,400, Plaintiff’s repair expenses, KRW 497, KRW 1395,00.