logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2020.02.14 2018가단6134
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On October 23, 2006, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the ownership of the salt farm before subdivision (hereinafter “Jri”) 17,775 square meters in Jinan-gun, Haan-gun (hereinafter “Jri”) before subdivision.

(2) On August 21, 1996, D completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to 16,701 square meters of L salt farm before subdivision.

(3) On February 19, 2004, Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to 16,321 square meters in M salt farm before subdivision.

(hereinafter referred to as “each salt farm before subdivision,” and if so named, it shall be specified as a parcel number).

Division and its later (1) The N, the Plaintiff’s large Arabic, was the Defendant B, C, and D, which was known to the ordinary world around 2018, and the part of each salt farm before the division (hereinafter “the respective salt farm of this case”) was purchased by O, which was the birthee, and it agreed to pay off the O’s obligations and own it as its own ownership, and the said part was demanded to transfer the ownership of the said salt farm to her.

(2) In the process, Defendant B, C, and D decided to divide the portion claimed by N from each salt farm before subdivision, and on June 11, 2018, the salt farms listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1 were divided into the salt farms listed in the attached Table 1, and the salt farms listed in paragraph (2) of the same Table from the L farm before subdivision owned by Defendant B, and the salt farms listed in paragraph (3) of the same Table from the M farm owned by Defendant C.

(hereinafter referred to as “each salt farm of this case” in the attached list Nos. 1; and, when referring separately to each salt farm, hereinafter referred to as “the salt farm of this case”). The location of each salt farm of this case and the salt farm before subdivision shall be as shown in the attached list Nos. 2.

(3) Thereafter, the heir of theO, including the Plaintiff, argued that he had the right to each of the instant salt farms against Defendant B, C, and D, not N.

C. The O’s death and inheritanceO died on May 20, 191, and the heirs of theO, including the Plaintiff, who were his/her father, were the Plaintiff on October 19, 2018.

arrow