logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고정448
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around August 28, 2017, the Defendant sent to the president of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government clan D D D D Building, which was a director of the clan C, to obtain signature on the register of the clan from August 2017 to August 27, 2017, the Defendant visited each of the family members residing in the members of the Seocheon-do Seocheon-si in order to obtain a signature on the register of the clan from August 1, 2017 to August 27, 2017, after visiting each of the family members residing in the members of the Seocheon-do Seocheon-si in order to obtain a signature on the register of the clan, and provided that the Defendant, without the resolution of February 2015, voluntarily taking personal profits, such as using the clan as fuel for the place of business of the clan (F), thereby allowing the victim F to inspect it to 23 members of the clan C, who was punished by the violation of the Forestry Act.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the reputation by pointing out the facts of the victim's performance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A statement of fact, a statement of fact, and a written statement of fact [the defendant and his defense counsel] [the defendant and his defense counsel who allowed the defendant to peruse the "written fact confirmation and written statement of fact" of this case shall be a paper member and it is not recognized that performance is not recognized because there is no possibility of spreading to many unspecified people in light of the nature of the closed

The argument is asserted.

However, the defendant, however, stated that the victim was punished by a fine of one million won in the forest and fields of the clan and paid a fine, so that it can be recognized to many people, i.e., 23 members of the clan who are not well aware of the fact. However, the above argument cannot be accepted on the ground that the subjects were the members of the clan, merely because they were the members of the clan.

In addition, the defendant and his defense counsel prepared the "written confirmation and petition" of this case in order to correct the problem because the victim was sentenced to a fine due to the violation of the Forestry Act, and the victim was engaged in the duties of the clan.

arrow