beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Despite the fact that the Defendant, with respect to three lots of land, including Chungcheong-gun C, was entirely entrusted with the authority of the owner of the instant building to conclude the instant building removal contract, the Defendant had been delegated by D with the authority to conclude the instant building removal contract. On behalf of the said company, the Defendant received money from the company that wishes to remove the building in advance as if he had entered into the instant building removal contract on behalf of the said company and received money in advance from the company that wishes to remove the building in advance.
1. On September 30, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document stating “name A, resident registration number E, address Guro-gu Seoul F,” and “name D, G, H building 2,473.78 square meters” in the name column of the agent’s personal information as “name A, resident registration number E, and address Guro-gu Seoul F,” and the item column of delegation, and then affixed a seal under the name of J of the delegating Person J, the name of the delegating Person’s name and seal, which was arbitrarily changed in advance, to the name of J of the International Group Chairman of the International Group J. 13, 2012.”
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the I Group Chairman of the I Group, who is a private document on rights and obligations, forged a letter of delegation on the removal of buildings under the J name.
2. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document submitted to the said M a forged document to believe that the said M was delegated the Defendant with the authority to conclude a contract for demolition of the instant building from L’s office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to L, thereby making the Defendant believe that the Defendant was delegated with the authority to conclude a contract for demolition of the instant building from D Co., Ltd.