logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.03 2013고단3376
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of five million won, by a fine of one million won, by a defendant B, and by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The drivers of two or more motor vehicles, etc. shall not jointly drive the motor vehicles, etc. on the road in a manner that causes danger to others or causes danger to traffic while driving their motor vehicles, etc. in a front and rear or right and right and right and right by side without justifiable grounds;

At around 00:30 on August 11, 2013, the Defendants: around 00:58 on the same day from the Do in front of the house of Defendant C located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the ice and underground car in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; Defendant C: (a) sent to the back seat of J Scidid, and the Defendant C: (b) was carrying the G on the back seat of L Scid, and Defendant B got on the back seat without a license plate; (c) the mixed cBR, which is a mixed cBR, with no license plate, went in front, rear, right and left; and (d) changed the lanes or changed the lanes from time to time to time, and changed the bus center.

As a result, the Defendants jointly passed through the front, rear, or left and right by side without any justifiable reason, thereby causing harm to others or causing danger to traffic.

2. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving Lusbrid A.

On August 11, 2013, the Defendant driven the above 00:58, and driven the off-to-face of the ice and the underground street in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-do, along the speed of about 70km from the ice and the new East Asian shopping center at a speed of about 70km each.

At night, the surface was milked at the time, and the above underground level was safety signs to proceed on a bend road at the entrance, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent accidents in advance by well examining the bank.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not see the front bank while proceeding in danger as described in paragraph (1).

arrow