1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is married with C in around 1977, and has a legal marital relationship until now. The Defendant has established a Buddhist relationship with C’s husband in early 2012 with C.

Since the defendant's act constitutes a tort, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of KRW 30,000,000 as damages to the plaintiff and damages for delay as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion of Litigation, etc. from the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in

B. As alleged by the plaintiff, the defendant did not have a relation with C, as alleged by the plaintiff.

2. As alleged by the Plaintiff, it is reasonable to view whether the Defendant and C have entered into an indefinite relationship with the Defendant.

According to the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, in particular, Gap evidence No. 5, it is recognized that C her flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly fl

However, the meaning of the above conversation cannot be interpreted to the same effect as the Plaintiff alleged, unless there is any support as to the background, such as how the above dialogue was made in any process and how the recording was made.

Therefore, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the fact that the Defendant and C entered into a non-wheeled relationship as alleged by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit to further examine the remainder of the damages, etc.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.