logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고정1245
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) committed an unlawful act with the Defendant, following the Defendant’s wife’s personal phone, using a text message, Kakao Stockholm message, etc. sent to the Victim D; and (b) committed an unlawful act with the Defendant

There has been doubtful doubts.

On November 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received personnel from G, a resident, on board a ship operated from Incheon Spole-gun E to F on November 16, 2014; (b) the Defendant “(F) failed to live,” and (c) sought the reasons therefor from the said G, “The denial and non-wheeled in D.”

(F) The term "does not live in F)" was referred to as "does not live in F."

However, there was no fact that the victim had a bad faith relationship with C as above.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness D, H, G, I, J, and K;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each certification of I, G, J, L, and K;

1. Recording (the defendant and defense counsel stated that the defendant had not made the victim and C to the effect that the victim and C had not made the victim and C to the effect that they had not come to the F, but it was merely an expression of opinion, and even if so, such a statement was made;

Even if there is no possibility of dissemination and there is no perception that the defendant is false, and there is no intention of defamation due to a statement made in the course of responding to another person's questions.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that the defendant defames the victim as stated in the facts charged in the judgment can be fully recognized.

A. G met the Defendant from this Court’s entry to F, and the Defendant was unable to live from F

In other words, the reason was asked.

arrow