logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.01.28 2014고단2438
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

1. Around 10:15 on September 3, 2014, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.150% from the restaurant of “a Cheongan Sea State” located in the 215-1, the upper mouth of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, to the Yandong-gu, Ansan-si, the Defendant’s residence.

2. From September 10, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (AD) (AD) on September 3, 2014, while driving the said vehicle, reported for use to turn to the left at an irregular speed depending on one lane among the three-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes.

Since there is a remote distance where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to maintain a safety distance with the front vehicle and to keep the direction and the left and the left well while observing the signal, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction and the brakes so as to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, while neglecting such duty of care, the Defendant was negligent in driving under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1), and the part on the back part of the back part on the left part of the GMW car of the victim F (the 49-year-old driver) driving in the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was sent at the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle and left left at a 300-meter left part. The Defendant was found to have been her back the part on the back part of the driver’s seat, which was opened by the victim when the victim stopped after the Defendant’s vehicle and stopped after the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as light fluoral salt, for about three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant immediately stops to the extent that the damaged vehicle damages approximately KRW 21,350,780 of the repair cost, thereby providing relief to the victim.

arrow