1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the application of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second 4 and the fifth 5 papers stated that "The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 4, 5-1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 6, 7, 8-1 through 5, 9-1 through 5, 9-1 through 5, 10, and 10 shall be admitted, taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings."

(b) from 4th to 18th parallels:

(1) The aforementioned facts and the evidence revealed earlier, the fact-finding results of the fact-finding and the overall purport of oral argument as to the head of the wife population U-do, the following circumstances, i.e., ① the Korean and Chinese characters identical between “C” and “J”, the Plaintiff’s preference to the land of this case, ② the statement itself was omitted in the case where the address of the situation title holder belongs to the Eup/Myeon, such as the location of the land of this case. The land investigation division of this case appears to have been residing in the GU-Gun V, which is the location of the land of this case. ③ The Plaintiff’s prior domicile of J as the Plaintiff’s preference is “V” such as the permanent domicile of the GU-do, which is the location of the land of this case, and ③ there is no evidence to deem that there was the name “Tri” as the land of this case, ④ there is no evidence to deem that there was the title “Tri” as the Plaintiff’s successor to the land of this case, and ⑤ there is no evidence to support the Plaintiff’s succession to the land of this case.