beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The abstract of the public prosecution;
A. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:53, the victim C operated by the victim C in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 22, 2016; and (b) the victim’s market price owned by the victim who was under custody in the said car air conditioners while he/she was working for the said car conditioners, and (c) juf juf 1 enlisted in the amount equivalent to KRW 4,500.
In other words, one's own bank was placed in his own bank and stolen it.
B. The Defendant, at around 19:48 on June 23, 2016, took out one bottle of drinking water on a page at the market price equivalent to KRW 4,000, which was owned by the victim who was under custody in the said car air conditioners while working as a part of a part of a part-time, while working as a part-time, at the location of the above paragraph (1).
In other words, one's own bank was placed in his own bank and stolen it.
2. Determination
A. The defendant's assertion argues that although the defendant brought drinking water like the facts of prosecution, the defendant's assertion that the victim would drink drinking water to a part-timer, including the defendant, he/she would bring about drinking water.
B. According to the evidence of determination, the witness E, who worked in the above carpet at the same time as the Defendant, stated to the effect that the victim would drink while driving or working for the drink, and that E testified to the effect that he sent the Defendant “the president (victim) to the effect that he would drink the drink,” and that the other worker “F,” also stated to the effect that he would not want to drink a drink by the victimized person.
(3) In addition, drinking water that the defendant stolen is not worth property value as a product of approximately 4,00 won.
④ Meanwhile, even after the Defendant was working in the above car page, the victim did not have any problem of larceny. The Defendant filed a claim for damages against the victim on or around December 2016 (Seoul Western District Court Decision 2016Gaz. 48928) and thereafter on February 23, 2017.